We have your recruiting solution
Employment News
Unmonitored Bonus Incentive Schemes a "Sham".

FACTS The claimants were employed by Hartlepool Borough Council in a variety of roles, including minibus driver, school escort, kitchen staff, cleaners and leisure workers. The claimants' roles did not attract any type of bonus, with the exception of the kitchen staff, who received a bonus as a result of previous litigation.

Between them, the claimants compared their roles with other roles at the council, namely trade supervisor, joiner, electrician, painter, driver, labourer, gardener, road sweeper and refuse driver.

As a result of negotiations with trade unions in the 1970s, these roles, which were primarily undertaken by men, attracted incentive bonuses. The claimants brought equal pay claims, arguing that they were performing work of equal value and/or work rated equivalent to their male comparators.

The council argued that the incentive bonus schemes were performance related and in place to improve productivity. It claimed the difference in treatment was due to a genuine material factor which was not the difference in sex.

DECISION The Employment Tribunal found that the council's incentive bonus schemes were a sham. It held that the reason for the introduction of the schemes disappeared years ago, and they could no longer be held to constitute an incentive.

There was no proper monitoring of the schemes and any reviews of performance that did take place were only done in response to new systems or new technology. Performance was not measured on any basis that would improve the employees' productivity, but instead was tailored to work already done. The reason for the schemes was "tainted by sex", said the tribunal, and the claimants' claims were upheld.

The council appealed, arguing that the tribunal should not have taken into account its absence of proper monitoring as to the continued effect of the schemes. The council claimed that if it thought the schemes were achieving their objectives, then that should be enough.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that the tribunal had been entitled to consider the absence of proper monitoring. The correct question to ask was: "Were the schemes intended to and do they in fact achieve productivity improvements?"

The tribunal needed to establish whether the schemes were genuine and achieved their purpose.

The EAT held that the reason for the schemes' introduction in the 1970s could not be relied upon to provide a genuine reason for the continuation of the schemes in 2004, which was when these claims were first brought, and dismissed the appeal.

IMPLICATIONS This case emphasises the importance of monitoring and properly regulating any type of pay scheme, including pay rises and overtime pay as well as bonus schemes.

It will not be enough to show that a scheme creating a difference in treatment was justified at the time of implementation - a scheme that does not start out as discriminatory could become so in the future.

Human Resource and Recruitment Services

Connect hr strategy

We offer a friendly specialist approach to Human Resource and Recruitment services across a broad range of industries. We work with a wide variety of clients across the UK. For a printable pdf brochure click here.

As a team of Human Resource consultants we understand business and the issues that go with it. We specialise in supporting you to get the best from your staff at all times.

Our services include specific projects, project management, and outsourced HR support with simple packages bespoke to your business that are cost effective and assist your business to grow.

From small business start ups with contracts of employment, company handbooks and staff performance issues, to HR strategy, recruitment, employment tribunals and staff benefit schemes in large organisations, we have the solutions at competitive prices.

We are listed on the North East England Service Provider Register.
Simple HR packages…
  • We can charge by the hour or as a day rate for any work carried out which would include: specific advice, administration, document design, consultancy and on site work
  • We can build a specific service agreement to suit your business requirements and budget that can include access by telephone to your personal HR Manager based on a fixed monthly fee
  • We can work on a specific project with a fixed price agreed before we start
  • We offer a free HR health check and consultation with absolutely no obligation.

Recruitment fees...

  • The choice is quite simply yours, fixed fees or based on a percentage of the first annual earnings, agreed in advance and only charged after employment has commenced. We offer a rebate structure with most placements.
With such flexible options on packages and fees you should never leave yourself open to a risk that could be minimised or prevented
Stand out from the crowd

National Minimum Wage Regulations 1999 (Amendment) Regulations 2008 come into force

The Regulations increase the main (adult) rate of the national minimum wage from £5.52 to £5.73 per hour. In addition, the development rate increases from £4.60 to £4.77 and rate for workers aged 16 and 17 increases from £3.40 to £3.53 per hour.